Explore every session of The Long Council.
No. Prices trigger the reaction, but campaigns and leaders decide who gets blamed for them.
Fearing AI's power is not a distraction: the owners and the power are the same danger, viewed from two sides.
Returning named powers to national parliaments could strengthen the EU; leaving the table to gut it could not.
No company should hold a single switch that can silence an army mid-battle.
France keeps producing unrest because its institutions block both exit and voice, then treat the pressure as a policing problem.
AI will not kill everyone, but specific deployments are already harming people and some cannot be undone.
Price cars out of city centers; only ban them where pricing cannot be made to work.
A cash floor beats a welfare bureaucracy. Beyond that, the council splits on who should own the machines.
Immigration raises national income, but whether specific workers gain or lose depends on institutions that most countries have not built.
Europe cannot win the AI spending race, but it can make its approval the price of entry to safety-conscious markets worldwide.
America's dominance was built by productive markets and then locked in by institutions that made others pay to sustain it.
Surveillance must be stopped before it is built, not governed after the state holds the data.
Yes, but the council splits on whether obligations within the current ownership structure can ever be enough.
No member endorses a US sovereign wealth fund as currently proposed. The split is over what to build instead.
EU cross-border rail stalls because each member state pays now and waits decades to benefit, while no corridor-level institution enforces shared commitments.
The trading system already extracts wealth from poor countries. The council splits on whether taxation and aid reverse that flow or entrench it.
Europe must build shared compute infrastructure and use public procurement to anchor European AI capacity before dependency becomes impossible to reverse.
Cities should govern tourist volumes, but resident-designed pricing beats blanket administrative caps.
Bind the bulb sector to the *waterschappen* water rules, then price extraction and runoff so growers pay the real cost.
Zoning reform is the necessary first move, but supply alone will not house the lowest-income families.
Capitalism can survive AI, but only if redistribution happens before ownership concentration captures the governments that would impose it.
Tax wealth, not just income, but preserve the corporate rates that generate revenue.
Government must build housing directly while removing barriers to private construction. Market signals fail when speculation dominates shelter.
Yes, but states must build AI expertise before writing rules.
Trade barriers will slow European innovation more than they protect strategic industries.
Build digital systems outside existing ministries, then force bureaucrats to use them or lose their jobs.
Regulate ultra-processed foods like tobacco through warning labels, taxes, and marketing restrictions.
Markets create wealth but cannot justify how it spreads. Government must guarantee floors without destroying the price signals that coordinate production.
Reform the polder model with accountability mechanisms and decision deadlines, but preserve stakeholder consultation where it adds value.
Build selective domestic AI capacity while maintaining foreign partnerships. Total dependence is dangerous; total independence is wasteful.
Governments print money because the political cost of fiscal adjustment arrives in months while inflation arrives in years.
Libertarian policy delivers growth when institutions have failed, but who bears transition costs determines whether it enhances freedom.
Regulate AI through multiple competing jurisdictions with clear, enforceable rules rather than comprehensive global frameworks.
Block the acquisition and build domestic alternatives at higher cost.
Current global tensions will trigger recession unless governments coordinate immediate fiscal response while markets adjust.
Europe must build exit options from Chinese manufacturing through targeted subsidies, but not attempt full industrial autarky.
The council establishes that extreme wealth concentration fundamentally alters the relationship between economic and political power, creating governance consequences that extend far beyond individual tax burdens.