The Long Council

Who was selected, and why

Should the EU assist Trump's military to free the Strait of Hormuz?

The panel · 27 April 2026 · 5 voices
The central tension

National sovereignty and international law versus alliance obligations and energy security.

Selected members
Helmut Schmidt
Helmut Schmidt
Crisis LeadershipEnergy SovereigntyDecisive Pragmatism
Will argue: Energy security justifies alliance cooperation, but Europe must maintain independent decision-making capacity and avoid subordination to US strategic priorities
European energy security and alliance management with the US under crisis conditions · His 1973 oil embargo response, NATO Double-Track Decision, and consistent framework that energy dependence is a sovereignty question
Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu
Strategy Over ForceStrategic DeceptionKnow the Enemy
Will argue: Military intervention in Hormuz risks escalation beyond any achievable objective; securing energy flows requires diplomatic and economic positioning, not force projection
Strategic assessment of military intervention in a critical maritime chokepoint · Core principles on avoiding unnecessary conflict, achieving objectives without fighting, and intelligence over force
Margaret Thatcher
Margaret Thatcher
Free MarketsLimited StateRule of Law
Will argue: International maritime law and alliance obligations require supporting US operations to maintain principle of free navigation against Iranian threats
Alliance solidarity, sovereignty of navigation rights, and response to threats to international commerce · Falklands War decision-making, Atlantic alliance primacy, and documented positions on freedom of navigation
Charles de Gaulle
Will argue: Europe should not subordinate its Middle East interests to American military strategy; diplomatic solutions through European-Iranian dialogue preferable to military escalation
European strategic autonomy versus Atlantic alliance dependence in Middle East interventions · Withdrawal from NATO command, Suez Crisis positions, and consistent framework of French/European independence from US strategic direction
Ibn Khaldun
Ibn Khaldun
Social CohesionCyclical HistoryModerate Taxation
Will argue: Military pressure on Iran may consolidate rather than weaken the regime; economic and diplomatic approaches more likely to achieve sustainable arrangements
Analysis of intervention in regions under existing power structures and the dynamics of external pressure on established regimes · Asabiyya theory applied to regional power dynamics and the effects of external military pressure on internal cohesion
Considered but not selected
Eleanor Roosevelt: Relevant for international law frameworks but insufficient military/alliance strategy record for this specific decision
Adenauer: Strong on Atlantic alliance but died before significant Middle East energy crises; less relevant than Schmidt's documented crisis experience
Mandela: Negotiation framework relevant but no documented positions on maritime security or energy geopolitics