The Long Council
Who was selected, and why
Is it useful for the US to have military bases on every continent?
The central tension
Global military presence as security guarantee versus imperial overstretch and legitimacy costs.
Selected members
Helmut Schmidt
Will argue: US global presence provides stability but must be sustained through genuine alliance partnerships, not unilateral positioning
Experienced alliance management and the strategic value of US presence in Europe during Cold War
David Ben-Gurion
Will argue: Military presence must serve concrete strategic purposes and be welcomed by host populations; presence without clear objectives becomes vulnerability
Managed small state security through pragmatic great power relationships and understood the costs/benefits of external military dependence
Sun Tzu
Will argue: Supreme strategic excellence is achieving security without permanent military deployment; bases should enable strategic flexibility, not create fixed commitments
Strategic positioning, intelligence networks, and the principle of achieving objectives at minimum cost
Considered but not selected
Thatcher: Strong advocate for transatlantic alliance but primarily focused on European theater rather than global deployment strategy - Adenauer: Relevant for alliance management but his framework was specific to European integration and post-war German circumstances - Machiavelli: Strategic thinking applicable but lacks documented engagement with the specific challenges of maintaining distant military commitments